In the last few years we are seeing a growing interest in Entrepreneurially creating new products and services for seniors.
It perhaps started with the fax machine or maybe the Sony Walkman or maybe, even before that, the pocket calculator. But for most of us we have lived through wave after wave of technology revolutions. I can remember during my high school years my mom bought my father a Panasonic calculator that did the four basic math functions plus square roots. She paid close to $400 for it (think $2,000 to $3,000 in todayโs dollars). We played with it for hours so impressed by how magical it was. Today, calculators that do much more are used as trade show giveaways. Through most of my life new technology has been invented with teens and middle age adults being the target market but this is changing. In the last few years we are seeing a growing interest in entrepreneurially creating new products and services for seniors. While it would be hard to argue that anyone has come-up with the killer technology thing for seniors, there is no shortage of people and companies working on finding that next thing.
Finding and Funding the Next Big Thing for Seniors
A few weeks ago leading senior living investment banker Ziegler and LinkโขAge Ventures announced the launch of the Ziegler LinkโขAge Longevity Fund. After spending a couple of weeks negotiating calendar dates (mostly my fault) I got a chance to chat with John Hopper, the chief investment officer for the fund. Here is what he had to say about the industry and the fund:
- The reason for the fund is that, with the aging population and a continuously changing healthcare marketplace, there is a great deal of uncertainty. While uncertainty means unpredictable risks it also represents great opportunity for new products and services.
- This fund has a little over $26 million to invest. It is a closed fund, meaning that they are not taking new investors.
- There are a total of 90 limited partners which includes 70 not-for-profit senior living providers. These partners are particularly committed to finding and funding new ventures that will improve the lives of the seniors they serve. These providers can be great early customers and pilot sites where products and services can be fine-tuned.
- I asked John what kinds of companies they are looking for:
o Companies that have a finished product or service, meaning they are not a seed capital fund.
o Companies that have some revenue. This does not mean they need to be profitable, but they do need to be able to demonstrate they have a saleable product.
o Company that have already done some fundraising. It could be in the form of friends and family or a seed fund.
- Their ideal investment size is half a million to 2.5 million dollars but for the right opportunity could go up to 5 million dollars.
- As with any private equity fund like this, part of the investment equation is to explore the exit strategy for their investments. Johnโs response was that of course the big win would be an IPO but other exits might include recapitalization by a larger fund or sale to a larger company in a related business.
Who Cares
Finally I asked John why my readers, senior living providers and operators, should care. His response was that paying attention to what the fund invests in provides a great opportunity to explore new technologies and services that could benefit their residents. You can see the press release about the fund here To learn more or submit your new venture for possible funding you can visit the Ziegler LinkโขAge Longevity Fund website.
My Reader Questions
Do you care? Are you interested? If you had a chance to do a pilot for a new venture would you be willing? Steve Moran
If you like this article (or even if you donโt) it would be a great honor to have you subscribe to our mailing list HERE
Steve…
I always enjoy your posts!
I am already doing a pilot for a new aging-in-place idea and its exciting. I don’t yet meet the qualifications that your investor pool is looking for, but I will be there within a few months!
My program, Golden Girls Network, provides a registry for single older adults, mainly women, who would like to have a live-in companion as they both age-in-place. I am currently teaching a conference call class called “How to Start a Golden Girls Home” and I’m talking to women all over the country and its exciting to hear the enthusiasm for this new idea….we get to stay in our homes longer and we have someone to eat dinner with. Each companion looks out for the other, and we save money on the cost of housing. The common thread in these conversations is that none of us wants to move to assisted living and the cost is too high. This companionship program will soon become another alternative in the aging-in-place spectrum.
Hi Bonnie
What you are doing is exciting and I would love to hear more about it.
Steve
sounds like Golden Girls is great. we should talk. phone 650 968 8446
Every so often these guys send out a PR about this phantom fund. Here’s one from 2012 (!). For a fund that was born so long ago I’m always surprised why they don’t ever invest in anything. This is evidenced by the lack of companies on their site, crunchbase, and, perhaps most tellingly given their fondness for PRs, lack of PRs touting their awesome foresight.
Guy sort of a fair comment, except I would add that sometimes when people start new ventures it just plain takes longer to get going that you had hoped or desired.
Steve
It would be interesting to note who the provider organizations are. It seems that at all the conferences for the “new tech” solutions, there is little appetite by provider organizations. I think because so much of the tech is geared for the consumer and not a provider environment. The right technology, providing the right solutions for seniors AND caregivers could be a huge differentiator for move-ins.
Great observation Bailey.
Steve
Mr. Roth: Hello, my name is John Hopper and I am the Chief Investment Officer of the Ziegler LinkAge Longevity Fund. I wanted to respond directly to your comments. Our Fund had its initial close in March of 2014 and final close in June of 2014. Accordingly, I can assure you that we are not a “phantom” fund as you claim. Since that time we have already made one investment and are in the process of closing a second. I am not sure where your information is coming from, perhaps you have us confused with someone else. As for your comments regarding “lack of companies on their site, crunchbase, and, perhaps most tellingly given their fondness for PRs, lack of PRs touting their awesome foresight”, I can only say this…we do not maintain a public site for our fund. Our investors have access to our own internal data site with all relevant information for them. Also, because we are made up of mostly senior living providers as our investors, we are not interested in populating databases in order to position ourselves for future fund raising. This fact also gives us a slightly different perspective on PRs. The PRs, websites and databases you mention are very important for funds that are providing information to potential new investors. We are not in that position and our success will be measured by our current investors based on investment return and our ability to assist in the process of bringing innovative new products to the industry. Our focus is on doing our job for our investors and helping grow companies that provide value to them and the senior living industry. I hope you find this information informative and helpful.
Thank you, John Hopper
Hi John,
You might want to check with your IT guys because this certainly looks like a “public site for your fund”: http://www.linkageconnect.com/?page=link-ageventures
And here’s an article quoting you that the fund would be set up at the end of 2012(!): http://medcitynews.com/2012/04/venture-fund-for-aging-related-products-offers-unique-benefits-to-portfolio-companies/
Also interesting how your PR and marketing is all around “venture” yet the SEC Form D submission ticked Private Equity instead: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1602193/000160219314000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
Your investors would be wiser to partner with Aging 2.0, RockHealth, or even a simple AngelList syndicate. That is, of course, if any of the “fund’s” capital came from external investors.
-Guy
Hi Guy:
I am always glad for reader contributions. Feels like there is some back story here between you and the leadership of this fund.
Steve
Thanks again John for talking with me and we look forward to watching your progress.
Steve
Guy: Thank you for the response. I do, however, believe you are comparing “apples and basketballs.” No need to check with my IT guys, the website you refer to is for LinkAge Ventures, a subsidiary of the LinkAge organization that is formed to make direct investments for the benefit of its members (one of three LinkAge entities). The article is referencing (as does the Form D filing you refer to) the Ziegler LinkAge Longevity Fund. The Fund is a completely separate legal entity and is managed by a different team, and has a much broader investor base and completely different investment criteria and standards. Steve’s article is only about the Fund. (and yes, the Fund does have a large base of “external investors”)
Guy, I am not sure if there is a back story that is driving your comments, but I hope that this is helpful. I appreciate your conclusory statements at the end of your post, but to my knowledge we have never met nor have you had any direct experiences with our Fund, but I would be happy to provide more information if you would like.
Best, John